One of the major components of government
farm programs is the opportunity to place crops under loan with the Commodity Credit
Corporation (CCC) at a set "loan rate" for a period up to nine months. The
producer has the option of either repaying the loan plus accrued interest or forfeiting
the crop to the CCC and keeping the loan proceeds (no interest is charged). Because of
this ability to forfeit the collateral in return for loan forgiveness, treatment of the
loans on agricultural balance sheets has evolved into three basic approaches:
- Inventory pledged as collateral on the loan is shown on the balance sheet at the higher
of market value or the loan rate. The CCC loan principal amount is shown as a current
liability. Accrued interest is shown only to the extent that market price of the
collateral exceeds interest due.
- Basically the same as approach number 1, except that loan and accrued interest are not
shown as a current liability. They are netted against the inventory amount, and the
resulting net equity, if any, is shown as inventory. The gross amount of inventory and the
CCC amounts are usually disclosed as well.
- The GAAP approach requires showing the CCC principal amount and total accrued interest
as current liabilities. The inventory is shown at market value, unless that is less than
the principal and interest owed. If it is, the inventory is written up to equal the total
of the liabilities.
Proponents of the net equity approach, number 2, argue that it reduces
distortions in the current ratio and other measures caused by heavy utilization of what is
essentially "free" debt. They argue that many producers utilize the loan
programs merely as a cash management tool and would not require that much outside debt
funding. Further, since use is heaviest when market price is substantially below loan
rates (implying large amounts of default), the loan is essentially a sale of product even
though title has not yet passed.
For credit analysis purposes, the FFSC recommends adoption of approach
number 1 as the acceptable method of handling CCC loans.
While the FFSC feels the GAAP approach, number 3, is the most desired
method, it would create major problems for most systems utilizing a cash-to-accrual
approach for deriving an accrual adjusted income statement. Since the write-up of
inventory and the offsetting accrued interest charge will not be turned into cash
transactions, it would have the effect of overstating both VFP and interest expense in the
year the loan was reflected on the balance sheet, and then understating it in the
following year. Or, conversely, it would require a continual tracking of the accrued
interest amounts on individual loans that the producer may have no intention of repaying.
Finally, with loan programs longer than nine months, such as the Farmer-Owned Reserve and
CCC extensions, the accrued interest amount can become very large and even more
potentially distorting.
The final issue related to government loan programs is the income
treatment of the proceeds. There was strong agreement among the FFSC members that, for
analysis purposes, CCC loan transactions should not be treated as a sale of inventory
until title has passed (loan was forfeited), regardless of the "intent" of the
producer or the tax treatment followed. |